I am not the seminarian who won the primary--that would be James Talarico, who came to seminary with a wealth of education and experience: an M.Ed from Harvard, a stint with Teach for America, and time in state level politics. News reports call him a seminarian, but he's earned the MDiv. Maybe he's like me, an MDiv but still tasks to do before ordination.
I've done a bit of internet searching, and I can't tell what kind of Presbyterian church he's from, the more conservative branch or the more liberal one. From his comments, it sounds like the more liberal one, but I did hear one commenter say that it wasn't the PCUSA branch, which I think is the most liberal.
I think of his candidacy committee. Is the U.S. Senate a mission field? Can he be ordained to serve the Senate?
If he wins the election, does his desire to be a minister change? Is this something he'll do later? The U.S. Senate doesn't seem like a bivocational fit.
Most of all, I am happy that someone with a gentler religious view can be a viable candidate. We need more people with gentler views, but those of us with gentler views don't have the political scaffolding and resources that we would need.
1 comment:
We should not think that serving in the ministry as a clergy person is contradicted to being a member of Congress or other levels of government. How is living out one’s faith life any different here? Current Senators Raphael Warnock and James Langford, the former Senator John Danforth and others throughout our history have so served in their dual calling to God and their constituents.
Post a Comment