Saturday, February 14, 2026

The Feast Day of Saint Valentine

Here's one of those strange feast days, a feast day that's more popular in the general culture than it is in the church culture that pays attention to saints and their days. 

Those of us in religious circles might spend some time thinking about this feast day and the ways we celebrate it, both within our religious cultures and in popular culture.  I've often thought that marriage at its best is sacramental:  it demonstrates to me in a way that few other things can how deeply God loves me.  If my spouse's love for me is but a pale shadow of the way God loves me, then I am rich in love indeed.

I use the word marriage cautiously.  I don't mean it the way that some Christians do.  I mean simply a love relationship between adults that is covenantal and permanent in nature, as permanent as humans are capable of being.

I realize that this day is fraught with sadness and frustration for many people. I went to elementary school in the 1970's, before we worried about children's self esteem. If you wanted to bring Valentines for only your favorite five fellow students, you were allowed to do that. So, some people wound up with a shoebox/mailbox full of greetings and treats, and some wound up with very little.  I was in the middle, but instead of focusing on how lucky I was to have love notes at all, I compared my haul to those of my prettier friends.  I'm still working on remembering the wisdom a yoga teacher told me once:  "Don't compare yourself to others.  It won't help your balance."

I still worry about how this day might make people feel excluded.  I worry that as with baptism, we don't support people in their covenantal relationships in all the ways that we could.  I worry that a day that celebrates love in this way makes people who don't have a romantic relationship feel doomed.

To me, this feast day is essentially a manufactured holiday, yet another one, designed to make us feel like we must spend gobs and gobs of money to demonstrate our love.

Every day, ideally, should be Valentine's Day, a day in which we try to remind our loved ones how much we care--and not by buying flowers, dinners out, candy, and jewelry.  We show that we love by our actions:  our care, our putting our own needs in the backseat, our concern, our gentle touch, our loving remarks, our forgiveness over and over again.

And sustained by the love that sustains in our homes, we can go out to be a light that shines evidence of God's love to the dark corners of the world.  Every week, we are reminded of the darkness, and some weeks it intrudes more than others.  We must be the light that beats back the darkness.

On this Valentine's Day, let us go out into the world, living sacraments, to be Valentines to one another, to show a weary world the wonders of God's love.

Friday, February 13, 2026

A Creed Is Not a Pledge of Allegiance

Yesterday in my Lutheran Foundations class, we had a great discussion about the 3 creeds that are so important to the Church:  the Apostles Creed, the Nicene Creed, and the Athanasian Creed.  We talked about how they've been used, and they've been used as part of worship, primarily.  In Luther's time, and perhaps ours, most people had at least one creed memorized, along with the Lord's Prayer.

We talked about how the creeds can be a stumbling block for 21st century believers.  Is it lying to say a creed in worship if we don't believe in certain concepts?  My professor said that it's an interesting starting point for a conversation, but it's not a reason to reject a believer or a seeker.

My professor said, "A creed is not a pledge of allegiance."  I loved this way of conceptualizing a creed, so I wanted to make sure that I noted it here.  My professor said that a creed is one of our anchors that keeps us connected to the ancient church.  It's more about church history and what we've agreed is important as a Church.  It's not about what we say that we must believe to be part of the congregation or to make it to Heaven, the way many people use both the creeds and scripture.

My professor is president of one of our Lutheran seminaries, United Lutheran Seminary, so I'm glad to be reassured of this Lutheran approach to the creeds.  As we closed our class, he referenced our former bishop, Elizabeth Eaton, who said we didn't need new creeds, that our old creeds give us plenty to work with, without adding anything new.

I love this perspective on the creeds that I got from the class, which is a different one from the church history classes that I took.  I feel lucky to have had this opportunity. 

Wednesday, February 11, 2026

Meditation on This Sunday's Gospel

 The readings for Sunday, February 15, 2026:


First Reading: Exodus 24:12-18

Psalm: Psalm 2

Psalm (Alt.): Psalm 99

Second Reading: 2 Peter 1:16-21

Gospel: Matthew 17:1-9


Here we are at Transfiguration Sunday again. We celebrate this festival on the Sunday before Ash Wednesday, and it's such a familiar story that we may feel that we can get nothing new from it. But it's a story that bears repeating.

When I read the Gospel again, I'm not surprised by Peter's offer to build booths and celebrate the Transfiguration in a commercial way. Christ's command to tell no one makes me pause. Why can't we share this amazing moment?

Christ says this often. Go and tell no one--that seems to be a constant command. And it seems antithetical to the task of the Church.

In just a few months, we'll get a very different Pentecost message. Aren't we supposed to go and witness? Spread the good news? If Jesus is our role model, what do we make of his command to stay silent?

In some ways, perhaps Jesus knew the times he lived in. He knew that early fame would undo his purpose. He knew that people would focus on the physical plane--"This man can heal my blindness"--but not the spiritual plane, the one where we need healing the most.

He also knew that people who see visions, who catch a glimpse of something otherworldly, are often shunned by the community. What would have happened if James and John and Peter came down from the mountain and proclaimed what they had seen? How would the community have responded?

Jesus knew that he couldn't appear too threatening to the status quo too early. In the verses that follow, the ones not included in this Gospel, Jesus makes clear that persecution follows those who see visions. And that persecution still persists today. Our culture tolerates those of us who pray. It's less tolerant of those of us who claim that God replies to our prayers.

The life of the believer is tough, and one measure of its difficulty is knowing when to speak, and knowing when to hold our tongues. Sometimes we should keep our counsel. Sometimes we should testify verbally. Always we should let our lives be our testimony.

Christ also might have been wary of the human tendency to rush towards transfiguration. We yearn to be different, but so often, we shun the hard work involved. We might embrace transformation before we stop to consider the cost.

Like Peter, we might want to turn Christ into Carnival: build booths, charge admission, harness holiness. Jesus reminds us again and again that the true work comes not from telling people what we’ve seen, but by letting what we’ve seen change the way that we live. Our true calling is not to be carnival barker, but to get on with the work of repair and building of the communities in which we find ourselves.

Tuesday, February 10, 2026

Teaching from the Buddhist Monks Who Are Walking for Peace

Like many, I've been moved by the Buddhist monks who are walking from Texas to D.C. for peace.  I even talked about them in a sermon in early January, as something giving me hope.

Today they'll be at the National Cathedral, and I'm not sure of their time in D.C. beyond that.  It's hard for me to imagine any officials from the federal government meeting with them, the way that state governing people along the way have, but I'm willing to be happily surprised.

In this post on Diana Butler Bass's Substack, she gives the monks' answer to why they are walking.  I want to make sure I have this, should I want to find the words later, so let me post them here:

"Some people may doubt that our walk can bring peace to the world — and we understand that doubt completely. But everything that has ever mattered began with something impossibly small. A single seed. A first mindful breath. A quiet decision to take one step, then another.

Our walking itself cannot create peace. But when someone encounters us — whether by the roadside, online, or through a friend — when our message touches something deep within them, when it awakens the peace that has always lived quietly in their own heart — something sacred begins to unfold.

That person carries something forward they didn’t have before, or perhaps something they had forgotten was there. They become more mindful in their daily life — more present with each breath, more aware of each moment. They speak a little more gently to their child. They listen more patiently to their partner. They extend kindness to a stranger who needed it desperately.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

And that stranger, touched by unexpected compassion, carries it forward to someone else. And it continues — ripple by ripple, heart by heart, moment by moment — spreading outward in ways none of us will ever fully witness, creating more peace in the world than we could possibly measure.

This is our contribution — not to force peace upon the world, but to help nurture it, one awakened heart at a time. Not the Walk for Peace alone can do this, but all of us together — everyone who has been walking with us in spirit, everyone who feels something stir within them when they encounter this journey, everyone who decides that cultivating peace within themselves matters.

One step becomes two. Two become a thousand. A thousand become countless. And slowly, gently, persistently — not through grand gestures but through ten thousand small acts of love — we can help make the world more peaceful.

This is our hope. This is our offering. This is why we walk.

May you and all beings be well, happy, and at peace."

Monday, February 9, 2026

Sunday and Salt

I was pleased with my sermon yesterday--it was a tighter composition than I'm always able to pull together.  And I feel like both sermons went well.  I preached on Matthew 5:  12-20, and I decided to focus on salt alone.  The believer as light metaphor is fairly easy to understand, and I feel like I've done that several times before.  But I didn't see any references to salt in my past sermons.

Yesterday morning, for the youth sermon, I made a big bowl of popcorn.  I left some of it unsalted and put it in sandwich bags.  I salted the rest and made more bags of popcorn.  

I'm not crazy about all the sandwich bags, but it's the easiest way for me to do my youth sermon on salt without getting popcorn all over the place, the way we would if I just passed around two big bowls.  Plus it minimizes germ spreading--no hands in the same bowl of popcorn.

As I divided the popcorn, I thought about seminary, about my Foundations of Preaching class.  In that class, we had a lot to do in a very short time, so I don't fault the professor for not talking about children's sermons much.  I'm glad that I'm old enough to have seen plenty of examples of both good and bad children's sermons through the years.

I did check with the parents before giving out popcorn--no allergies to popcorn or salt.  If I preach on this passage in the future, I might do the same for the adults.

To read a manuscript of my adult sermon, see this blog post.  To see the recording, I uploaded it here on my YouTube channel.


Sunday, February 8, 2026

Sermon for Sunday, February 8, 2026

February 8, 2026
By Kristin Berkey-Abbott



Matthew 5:13-20


Like many Americans in the later decades of the 20th century, my grandmother was told that she had high blood pressure and needed to watch her salt intake, which she interpreted to mean that she could not add salt to food. One of my enduring memories of her is the way that she worked around this rule. We’d have tomato sandwiches, and instead of giving the tomatoes on the sandwich a sprinkle of salt, she’d have a handful of potato chips.


She knew what she was doing; she always said, “I’m just eating these for the salt. Tomato sandwiches don’t taste right without the salt.” And being the nutritional expert know it all that I was as at the age of 28, I would say, “Grandma, I’m sure your doctor would rather have you use a sprinkle of salt on your sandwich than eat those high fat chips.”


And now, I can’t read this passage and others like it without thinking about the use of salt, both in the ancient world and in our own world. The use of light, both the literal use and the symbolic use, hasn’t changed as much in two thousand years. But our relationship to salt is different. Or is it?


Think about your own feelings about salt. Do you salt your food before you even taste it? Guilty. Do you have a variety of salts and swear that you can tell the difference between them? Me too. Well, that’s not exactly true, but I do swear that kosher salt is different from all the rest.


At this point you may be saying, “Wait, is Jesus giving us cooking commandments or dietary instructions?” To which I would say, maybe not literally. But in terms of how to live life—yes, he’s using salt as a way of teaching us about the life of the faithful, and the ways that the lives of faithful people can add dimension and nuance to their communities—and in doing so to change the world beyond their communities.


We’ve lost some aspects of this metaphor. In the time of Jesus, his Jewish listeners would have heard the message about salt and remembered that salt was a symbol of the Covenant that God made with God’s faithful people. Sacrifices in the temple would be sprinkled with salt as a sign of that covenant.


Salt was also used as a preservative—one reason why canned food often has a fair amount of salt. But in ancient times, before refrigeration, salt was the kind of preservative that meant you could have meat long after the point where ordinary meat would spoil. You could butcher an animal and not have to eat all the meat right away. You could get to the time of the year when it was impossible to find fresh meat, and if you had salted meat, you would have a much more interesting diet.


So, is that what it means in this context? What does it mean to think of ourselves as salt? Jesus is telling us that as believers, we enhance what is good. He is also telling us that faithful people elicit what is good. Just as salt brings forth some qualities of food that we wouldn’t have otherwise, followers of Jesus do the same for their societies. They make their societies better in ways that wouldn’t happen otherwise. Think about all the hospitals and universities and other types of schools and childcare centers that wouldn’t exist without the efforts of believers who took the words of Jesus about caring seriously. Similarly, many scientific developments happened because of a belief in a better world and that belief was often nurtured in communities of believers.


As I was driving this week, I listened to a show about vaccines, and one of the experts talked about polio and Jonas Salk, who created the polio vaccine. Because he refused to patent the vaccine, more people were able to get it across the world, and the disease was eradicated more quickly. Salk, who had Jewish immigrant parents, was educated in public schools, schools which were formed a century or more earlier by other immigrants who believed in education for all. The decision by Salk and other polio vaccine creators not to patent the vaccine so that more people could have access—that decision has inspired later generations to do the same.


As I listened to this interview with modern vaccine creators about the polio vaccine, I thought about another ancient use for salt. Long before our modern agricultural processes, people would use saline solutions to purify the soil and get it ready for planting. I thought about how previous generations can live faithfully, and not only enhance and preserve their own societies, but also prepare soil for future generations to grow and thrive.


Another darker use of salt has been a constant across empires, though, as a weapon of war. Across time, armies have sowed so much salt into the soil of adversaries that nothing else could take root.


As I go back to our reading from Isaiah, as I think about the relentless march of armies and world history, I think of what it would mean to read those passages in the context of being the salt that thwarts the evil that empires want to sow. If we feed the hungry, clothe the naked, care for those outside our family and friend groups, then we build a stronger society.


We might have been taught that good government should also want to do those things, but we know that it’s far more common for empires to rule by way of fear: fear of hunger, fear of exposure, fear of being cast out, fear of violence and imprisonment, fear of war. Those fears can keep more of us cowering in the shadows, not demanding the justice that God’s law, God’s law proclaimed by Christ, demands. If more of us cower, unsavory types can move in and make money from our collective misery. If we aren’t active in our societies, who will do the work of preserving, fertilizing, and enhancing so that our world is more in line with what God envisions for humanity, instead of what wealthy billionaires would inflict on us all? I know which one has a vision that is better for those of us outside the elite, and it’s not the wealthy billionaires. It’s God, the way God has been made known through the generations, through ordinary people like my grandmother.


My grandmother and I ate those tomato sandwiches in her breakfast nook, not the formal dining room. In that room, in addition to boxes of breakfast cereal and the everyday dishes, sat her hymnbook, her Bible, and her daily devotional. She began each day with a daily devotional and each meal was punctuated with prayer: prayers for her family, prayers for her church, and prayers for the world beyond. Those of us who joined her for meals saw a powerful, albeit quiet, example.


I have learned my grandmother’s lessons well, although not necessarily in the ways she might have foreseen. I will always salt my tomato sandwiches—with kosher salt, if it’s available. And I will spend every day looking for ways to be the salt in the larger world.


We live faithful lives, salty lives, in order to create the kind of soil that can support God’s vision, a vision of flourishing, not floundering. We live faithful lives, salty lives, so that society can be the kind of garden that will NOT be poisoned for the purposes of empire, so that those enemy poisons WILL NOT take root. We live faithful lives, salty lives, to nurture the next generations coming after us who will continue the work. We are not useless condiments, salt without flavor, just taking up space on the shelf. NO. We are here to keep our commitment to God. We are here to follow that commitment to the larger community. We are tiny grains of salt, each and every one of us good, each and every one of us able to overpower the evil that threatens to root itself in our communities. We are here to rebuild the ruins, to restore the streets, to repair every breach. In our doing, we will solidify the foundations of future generations.



Friday, February 6, 2026

Revisiting Reformation History

I am taking a Lutheran Foundations class at United Lutheran Seminary.  Because I went to a Methodist seminary, my Candidacy Committee required that I take this class on my route to ordination.  I thought it was a course in Lutheran theology, but it's much more than that.  It's a class that addresses the question:  what does it mean to be a Lutheran?

In yesterday's class, we went over the history of the Reformation, which was more than just Luther nailing his theses to the Wittenberg door.  Much of it was familiar to me from Church History class, but we spent a lot more time focused on the German part of the Reformation.

My professor stressed how the people of Luther's time must have seen these developments as God/Holy Spirit involvement.  Here's Luther, in a distant outpost of the Holy Roman empire, in a small university, causing all this disruption, and living to tell the tale.  I tend to think of Luther, and it was good to remember that he was about as marginal as it was possible to be, without being a peasant.

My professor pointed out that if you're the pope, and you excommunicate someone, you no longer have power over them.  Similarly, if you're the Emperor, and you put a price on someone's head outlawing them, you've played your highest card.  If that person persists in their actions, you've got no leverage left.

We talked a bit about Calvin too, less about Henry VIII.  At the end of class, our professor showed us a map of Europe showing which parts were Catholic, Lutheran, and Calvinist.  It's amazing to think about how these developments happened in a century, and people were very aware that they were living in a time of great change (unlike, say, people living in the 14-16th century, who were probably not thinking of themselves as living in "The Renaissance").

It's no wonder that Luther's contemporaries thought of him as having supernatural powers.  I'm trying to decide whether to use these ideas in Sunday's sermon or in a Transfiguration Sunday sermon.