Tomorrow, Mother Theresa will be made a saint. On Wednesday, on NPR's Morning Edition, I heard a story about the miracles that must be attributed to her, or anyone nominated for sainthood.
It's not enough to work miracles in life on this side of the grave; one must also work miracles after one's death: "The idea is that a person worthy of sainthood must demonstrably be in heaven, actually interceding with God on behalf of those in need of healing." The doctors come in, and if there's no medical explanation, the healing is declared a miracle.
Now I'm all for sainthood, even though I'm not a Catholic, and I've always understood the importance of setting the bar high so that not just anyone becomes a saint. But on Wednesday, as I heard the news report, I thought that the standard for miracle might not be high enough.
I thought of all the people I know who are alive now but would not be if we were living 50 years ago. Cures that would have once seemed miraculous--especially many cardiac operations--are now routine, occurring across the nation, many of them each and every day.
Does anyone go back to previous saints to examine those miracles? We could, after all. The news story reports that "more than 95 percent of the cases cited in support of a canonization, however, involve healing from disease." I'm not suggesting that sainthood be revoked. But it would be interesting to see if those stories of miracles hold up, in light of later medical developments.
To me, the true miracle of Mother Theresa is her faith, even as she felt God's absence, as her letters from her later years document. If someone can do the great things that she did, even while being unsure of God's presence--that's the true miracle to me, to carry on in the face of great doubt.
all men cheat…
1 week ago